Welcome!

My name is Jeff Sackmann, and thanks for visiting my website, GMAT HACKS!

I'm the author of The GMAT Math Bible and The GMAT Verbal Bible--the single most effective tools you can use to raise your GMAT Quantitative and Verbal scores. I've also created several other resources, including 1,800 practice problems and Official Guide-related materials designed to make your study time more effective and less painful.

While you're here, check out a complete list of tips, or browse by category using the links in the lower left-hand sidebar.


LSAT vs. GMAT

October 06, 2008

A surprising number of aspiring MBA students are lawyers, and even more GMAT test-takers have taken the LSAT. If you're in one of those categories, it's useful to know how the GMAT relates to the law-school admissions exam.

LSAT vs. GMAT Critical Reasoning

As you might expect, the LSAT is heavy on analytical thinking skills--the sort of thing that GMAT Critical Reasoning is designed to test. The LSAT has a very similar section, called "Logical Reasoning."

LSAT Logical Reasoning is nearly identical, just harder. Many of the question types are the same (assumption, strengthen, weaken, inference) but the passages are longer and, often, more technical.

Also, the LSAT has a few more question types that explicitly test your ability to dissect an argument. You might take the GMAT five times without ever seeing a Parallel Reasoning question, but on the LSAT, those are considerably more common.

LSAT vs. GMAT Reading Comprehension

Different section, same story. The LSAT has a Reading Comprehension section just like the GMAT does, and they even call it the same thing. Again, the difference is in complexity.

LSAT passages are often longer (sometimes considerably so), and the questions can be more complicated as well. If you've taken the LSAT, you will probably find GMAT material to be quite simple. The only potential problem is that you'll read too much into GMAT questions--compared to the LSAT, that level of complexity just isn't there!

Everything Else

The LSAT is perhaps best known for its "Logic Games" section. Those are nowhere to be found on the GMAT. Conversely, there's nothing like GMAT math on the LSAT.

LSAT vs. GMAT Format

The LSAT is still a pencil-and-paper test, while the GMAT is computer-based. Even though the CR/LR and RC content is easier on the GMAT, many lawyers and law-school students find this GMAT content challenging because it's on the screen.

On the GMAT, you can't take notes on the page, you can't highlight, you can't underline, and you have to do all the reading off of the computer screen. You may not need to practice GMAT verbal because of the content itself, but you do need to pratice doing it on a computer.

Studying For Both Tests

I've occasionally worked with students who need to take both the LSAT and GMAT in order to apply for combined MBA/JD programs. If you are in that position, I strongly recommend taking the LSAT first. It will build your analytical skills much better than will the GMAT.

One word of caution, though: Don't, under any circumstances, try to study for both tests simultaneously! It's simply too much. Study for one, take that test, then study for the other. It's still a huge challenge, but it's a bit more manageable that way.


How Much Does the GMAT Change Over Time?

September 29, 2008

The GMAC is constantly mixing new questions into the test pool and eliminating old ones. I don't know what the lifespan of a typical test item is, but I'd be surprised if it's more than a year or so.

That doesn't mean that the test changes very much. The specific problems may differ, but the format, the content, and the underlying patterns all stay the same.

Hints From the GMAC

As one piece of evidence, consider the Official Guide. The current, 11th, edition was published in September of 2005. A new edition is due soon, but the GMAC doesn't find it necessary to alter their study materials more than once every few years.

As a bit of further, more powerful, evidence, perhaps you've seen the 10th edition of the Official Guide. A large number of those questions reappear in the supplemental Official Guide books, and they still accurately represent what's on the test. (I don't recommend using the 10th edition, but it doesn't make a huge difference.)

From my own perspective, I could've written most of what is in The GMAT Math Bible five or ten years ago. There are some things I wouldn't have focused on as much, or others I might have highlighted more, but the content I covered would've been nearly identical.

In other words, if you prepared for the GMAT using only those materials that were available in 2000, you wouldn't sacrifice very much test-readiness in September 2008. You might not even notice the difference.

The GMAT Has Changed...A Little

That isn't to say the test is identical. It isn't. One noticeable difference is the difficulty level. The test is scored on a curve, and admissions keep getting more competitive, so every year, it's a little harder to get your target score.

That doesn't mean the content has changed much, though. I started working with GMAT students in 2000, and the topics that people worried about back then (combinations, probability, standard deviation, number properties) are the same one that cause concerns today.

The main difference is the increased pool of difficult questions. If the average test taker is getting stronger, the GMAT must have more items at the high end to distinguish between 730, 740, and 750 scorers. That, I think they've done.

What the Changing GMAT Means To You

It may come as no suprise that the GMAT is getting harder. There's not much you can do about that except to study harder. But apart from a few question types I highlighted in a previous article, you shouldn't alter your preparation strategy as if the GMAT is a different test every month.

If anything, you can use the predictability of the exam to your advantage. When you see a question that looks completely unfamiliar, you can rest assured (at least if you are well prepared) that it relates to something you already know.

The GMAT is a standardized test, and that means you don't have to worry about sudden shifts in content or question types. The stakes may be high, but so is the exam's consistency.


Need a better Quant score? Check out The GMAT Math Bible.